PLEASE USE A NAME WHEN COMMENTING

23 November 2025

Satmar Rebbe Draws Massive Crowd in Meron as Two-Week Israel Visit Continues

 MERON, ISRAEL — Thousands gathered on Motzei Shabbos in Meron as Rabbi Aharon Teitelbaum, the Satmar Rebbe of Kiryas Joel, led a major bonfire ceremony during his two-week visit to Israel.

The Rebbe arrived in the country earlier in the week for a rare and highly anticipated trip that has already drawn large crowds at every stop. Organizers in Meron erected large tents and expanded access areas to accommodate the surge of followers, including many who traveled from the United States to take part in the festivities.

Saturday night’s lighting — held near the tomb of Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai — served as the central public event of the visit, with the Rebbe delivering brief remarks before leading traditional songs as flames rose from the towering bonfire.

Throughout the visit, the Satmar leader has also met with prominent rabbinic figures, including Rabbi Moshe Sternbuch in Jerusalem, where the two discussed issues facing the Haredi community and reiterated strong opposition to Israel’s proposed draft law for yeshiva students.

The Rebbe’s schedule includes additional stops at Satmar institutions and visits with major Torah leaders before returning to the United States next week.

https://vinnews.com/2025/11/22/satmar-rebbe-draws-massive-crowd-in-meron-as-two-week-israel-visit-continues/

***********

NOTE:  if just The Satmar kehillos moved to Eretz Yisrael, the overwhelming numbers would drown the Erev Rav into straw with the energies of Yaakov setting them ablaze!







“Put Down The Gemara”………

 …… Israel’s High Court Demands Criminal Charges for Bnei Torah Who Don’t Enlist in IDF

“Put Down The Gemara”

this is a test from Shamayim

see hear The Satmar declaration! 

“… Sifrei Kodesh Torn and Disgraced…..

 

SHOCK: Yemenite Shul in Central Israel Ransacked; Sifrei Kodesh Torn and Disgraced



A Yemenite kehillah in the central Israeli town of Kadima-Zoran suffered a shocking act of rishus mere hours before the onset of Shabbos, when criminals broke into its beis knesses and desecrated sifrei kodesh, tearing up siddurim and seforim, according to footage and eyewitness accounts.

Mispallelim of the Mishkan Shalom Yemenite Synagogue arrived for tefillos on Friday night and were met with a horrific scene. Pages of siddurim were strewn across the floor, seforim were ripped apart, and even Sifrei Torah were thrown on the floor.

In a statement to the press, the shul described the devastation in stark terms: “There’s never been a pogrom like this.” They noted that after seeing the destruction, the kehillah immediately locked the building and refrained from further action out of kavod for Shabbos. A police report was filed as soon as Shabbos concluded.

Police in the area are said to be reviewing security footage and opening an investigation. The kehillah has also called for increased protection of religious sites to prevent future attacks on batei knesses and sifrei kodesh.

https://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/israel-news/2475565/shock-yemenite-shul-in-central-israel-ransacked-sifrei-kodesh-torn-and-disgraced.html



see hear The Satmar declaration! 



Reb Ginsbourg: "Rivkah went to inquire of Hashem"

 Rivkah went to inquire of Hashem"

The wondrous outcome of Rivkah's pregnancy, is that all that the nations create in this world, in the end result, is for the benefit of Bnei Israel, in their service of Hashem.

The Torah relates in our Parasha, the birth of Esav and Yaakov: (25:21-23) "Hashem allowed Himself to be entreated by’ Yitzchak," and his wife Rivkah conceived. The children struggled within her, and she said: ’If so, why am I thus? ‘. And she went to inquire of Hashem.

"And Hashem said to her: ’Two nations are in your womb; two regimes from your insides shall be separated; the might shall pass from one regime to the other, and the elder shall serve the younger’."

The Torah then relates: (25:24) ’When her term grew full, then behold! there were twins in her womb’.

Rashi comments on our psukim: ’Struggled’: This calls for a Midrashic interpretation, as it does not explain what this struggling was all about, and the Torah wrote:’If it be so, why am I like this?’

Our Rabbis interpreted it, as an expression of running. When she passed by the entrance of the Torah academies of Shem and Eber, Yaakov would run and struggle to come out; when she passed the entrance of a place of idolatory, Esav would run and struggle to come out.

‘If it be so’: that the pain of pregnancy is so great. ‘Why am I like this?: ’Why did I desire and pray to conceive?’

‘And she went to inquire’: to the academy of Shem.’

To inquire of the Lord’:’that He should tell her what would happen to her in the end.’

And the Lord said to her’: through a messenger. Shem was told through Divine Inspiration, and he told it to her.’

Two kingdoms will separate from your innards’:’from the womb they will be separated, this one to his wickedness, and this one to innocence’; ‘will become mightier than the other kingdom’:’They will not be equal in greatness: when one rises, the other will fall’.

Chezkuni - on this Rashi - as to the struggling within her, elucidates:’If so, the great pain of my pregnancy, better I die immediately, and not suffer further pregnancy pain.

‘And she went to inquire of Hashem’: to inquire from the prophetd, that lived in those days: what is this great struggling within her, as she knew that her period to give birth was not completed, and she was concerned lest she should lose the child.

‘And Hashem said to her’: to her by a messenger - some commentators say, that it was by Avraham, who was still alive then - who said to her - not to him, therefore he , Yitzchak -was unaware that Esav would be wicked.

‘Two nations are in your womb’: Do not fear if the pains of your pregnancy are great, as it this is because there are two nations within your womb, and greater are the pangs of pregnancy when there are two, than when there is only one.

‘The two will be separated from your womb’: Rashi commented:’This one to his wickedness, this one to his innocence’- we do not, at this point, know who will be the righteous one, and who the wicked - but as they grew, and Esav was one who knew hunting, a man of the field; but Yaakov was a wholesome man, abiding in tents.

‘The elder shall serve the younger’:Here it was decreed on Yaakov that he should be master over his brother.’

Rav David Pardo elucidates:’By a messenger’: As it is not respectful to the One Above, to suggest otherwise - more so, this raises a difficuly, as it then mentions the Name: ’And Hashem said to her’, seemingly in a way that does not seem respectful - therefore, Rashi expounds that it was in a respectful way, as it was via a messenger.’

Rav Moshe Sternbuch offers a different understanding, as to Rivkah’s inquiry: The Midrash - which Rashi brought - that the one would run and struggle to come out, when they passed by the entrance to the Torah academy, and the other one, likewise, but when they passed a place of idol worship - led Rivkah to have dread, that the child she bore, would be undecided, seeking houses of Torah study -yet, at the same time - also being attracted to houses of idol worship.

‘There is no-one worse than one who does this - vacillating between worshipping and serving idolatry- these deceivers being worse than even the errant Tzadukim, ‘performing the deeds of Zimri, and seeking the reward of a Pinchas.

To allay this concern, Hashem said to her: ’There are two nations inyour womb’: meaning: One will be attracted to the Torah academy, and the other to houses of idol worship.

Her mind was thus put at rest.

The Kli Yakar adds: Yaakov was certain - as he was a tzadik the son of a tzadik - that, from his side, any issue would be righteousbut was concerned regarding his wife - as she was the daughter of Betuel and the sister of Laban - that any seed coming from her, would be unworthy, as ‘she was barren’ - that the infertility was from her side.

He was therefore fearful lest impure seed should issue from her - just as Yishmael came from Hagar - and that, perhaps, this was the reason for her infertility.

Thus, when the sons struggled within her womb - one seeking to go out when at tthe entrance of the Torah academy, the other at the entrance to the house of idol worship - she felt with certainty that one would be righteous, and the other one, wicked.

She therefore said:’Why. am I thus?’, as I am like Hagar, and how am I any better than her - and why, then, did I entreat Hashem, to bear a child?

She therefore ‘went to inquire of Hashem: what purpose is there in my prayer?

Hashem answered her :’Two nations are in your womb’, they being Rebbie and Antonigus - and her prayer was helpful, that out of Esav also came righteous seed, like Antonigus and the rest of the righteous converts - which was not the case with Yishmael, and, in this regard, you are superior to Hagar.

Abarbanel - on the pasuk: ’She went to inquire of Hashem’ - expounds: Since she knew thar all that befell her was by Divine Providence, went to inquire from the one in charge, concerning the matter.

Rashi wrote that her inquiry was: ‘how will it end?’, snd that is the truth. Our sages said - that as she was not a prophetess - she went to inquire at the Torah academy of Shem and Eber, where she was told, in the name of Hashem: ’There are two nations in your womb’ - but it is more correct to say that she went to inquire from Avraham, who was still alive at that time, and who answered her in the words of Hashem:’Two nations are in your womb’, meaning: that there were twin fetuses in her womb.

It appears to me that the Torah informed that there were four factors in what she was undergoing.

The first, that there were two nations in her womb, meaning: that though they were the offspring of one father and one mother who were righteous - the children would not be so, but they would be differing in their natures, their faiths and their beliefs - as if they were from different nations, as if was from the east and the other from the west - which is why they were so different in every respect.

This is why they were ‘struggling’ in her womb, as they could not connect in the one place.

Second, ’two nations are in your womb’, meaning: do not think that one of these will be barren like his father and his grandfather, but, rather, that each would have prolific seed, each becoming nations, after their separation from the womb.

Third, ‘the might shall pass from one regime to another’, meaning: both, as well as having very different outlooks, will, in addition, will always be striving one against the other - never being at amity and peace with one another, as brothers - at times, one will have the upper hand, and at others, the other will triumph.

This is why they are now struggling in the womb, an allusion to what would occur in the future.

The fourth reason:’’the elder shall serve the younger’:, meaning: in additon to the other reasons, there will be another good reason for the enmity between these two nations, it being that the elder will be subservient to the younger - the opposite of the appropriate order of things - and therefore the older will struggle to be free of his subservience, and to overcome the younger - minded in the natural order of things -whilst the younger will strive to retain the rule he has been given by Divine Providence.’

Rav Pinchas Friedman expounds:’In asking::’If so, why am I?’, Rivkah was asking two questions: One: Why did Hashem cause that I should give birth to a wicked son::Esav? - and two: Why did Hashem cause that Yaakov and Esav be twins, whilst Yaakov is the root of sanctity, from whom all of Israel derive, whilst Esav is the root of impurity, from whom all the nations derive?

She therefore ‘went to inquire of Hashem’, to enlighten her, to understand the matter.

How does Hashem’s answer:’Two nations are in your womb’, address her question:’If so, why am I?’

To answer this, let us recall the Mishnah in Avot:’’All that Hashem created in this world, He created for His honor’ - how, then, can we understand this, when the will of the nations is the very opposite of the Will of Hashem?

Rambam gives us the key to this, saying: ’The purpose of Creation, is that man should attain מושכלות: understanding, in Torah and in service of Hashem - for these righteous men who are engaged in this noble pursuit, there is a need for the ‘lesser’ ones, to provide their needs, so that they are free to engage in the holy Torah.

This can be seen in Hashem’s mockery (Avoda Zara 2.) of the claims of the nations - that all they did, was to enable Bnei Israel to better engage in Torah and mitzvot, by building bath- houses and markets; Hashem mocks their ‘claimed virtue’, responding that they did not do this for the benefit of Bnei Israel, but solely to extort money from them, for the use of these facilities.

‘Rav Tzadok Hakohen beautifully relates this to the saying of the Rambam: Whilst this was far from their intention, Bnei Israel were better able to engage in their Torah studies, because of these amenities which were provided by the nations.

From this insight, we can glean Hashem’s answer to Rivkah’s query: Esav had to be created, to fulfill the blessing:’The elder shall serve the younger’: Yaakov, by unwillingly assisting him to engage in his holy endeavors.

Despite his great hatred for Yaakov, Esav - from whom all they did nations would descend - will, unwittingly andunwillingly assist the sons of Yaakov, to engage in an appropriate manner, in their Torah studies.

The wondrous outcome of all this, is that all that the nations create in this world, in the end result, is for the benefit of Bnei Israel, in their service of Hashem.

A parting gem from the Maharal: Why did Rivkah go to the Torah academy, to ‘inquire of Hashem’, and did not inquire of her holy husband - Yitzchak - or her revered father-in-law, Avraham - surely they were able to relay to her, Hashem’s answer, to her query!

Answer: In her humility, Rivkah surmised that her transgressions were the cause of the pain of her pregnancy, knowing the tradition - from that which was said by our Sages, regarding Leah, that the righteous women do not have pain in giving birth.

Rivkah therefore surmised that her pregnancy pangs, were a sign that she was not righteous, and therefore was careful not to make her husband and her father-in-law, aware of them, lest they consider her - unlike their present view of her - not to be righteous, and to thereby hold her in lower esteem, even leading Avraham to consider her an unworthy wife for Yitzchak, and to counsel him to divorce her.

She therefore went to the Torah academy of Shem, with her inquiry.’

לרפואת נועם עליזה בת זהבה רבקה ונחום אלימלך רפאל בן זהבה רבקה, בתוך שאר חולי עמנו.

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/418145

22 November 2025

The Butcher Didn't Expect This - R' Sruli Besser

Join a one-of-a-kind community sharing exclusive, never-before-seen content that explores how speech shapes our lives, relationships, and world. Discover how guarding your tongue and speaking with intention can uplift, heal, and inspire real change.

Rav Richter: There's No Business Like Sho-ah Business

Commenter to the above:

I went to the Holocaust Temple (Yad Vashem) one time. Like you said, it was a justification for the state of Israel. And that world that was destroyed was a world of Judaism, not secular nationalism

Pure Simcha | Rabbi Aharon Weinberg

 

An Israeli Intelligence Officer’s Search for God


by Yehudis Litvak

After witnessing the horrors of October 7th, veteran intelligence officer Guy Itzhaki found himself shattered—until an unexpected spiritual awakening began to piece him back together.

Guy Itzhaki is not the kind of man who startles easily.

A decorated IDF intelligence officer with more than 27 years of service, he spent his career on the front lines of Israel’s most shadowed threats. He fought in the Second Lebanon War, exposed Hezbollah tunnels along the northern border, tracked Iranian arms smuggling, and served for two years as assistant to then–Chief of Staff Benny Gantz. He lectured at the International Institute for Counterterrorism and even wrote a book on Hezbollah.

If anyone believed he had seen everything, it was Guy.

But on the morning of October 7th, 2023, something inexplicable jolted him awake at 6:30 a.m. There were no sirens, no alerts, no urgent calls—just a premonition that something was terribly wrong.

Only a few hours earlier, at around 3 a.m., Guy had received a cautious message from the army: intelligence teams were detecting unusual activity inside Gaza, but nothing conclusive. He had asked to be updated if the situation evolved and then went back to sleep. Now, with dawn barely breaking, his instincts told him he could not wait.

He called his deputy who sent an officer to the military headquarters. When the officer sent back images of white Hamas pickup trucks roaming freely through the streets of Sderot, Guy understood that this was war—one unlike anything he had witnessed in his decades of service.

Within an hour, the married father of four daughters was at military headquarters, watching live footage. “I read a lot of history books about the Yom Kippur War,” Guy said in an Aish.com interview, “But this was the first time in my life that I saw a scene from the Yom Kippur War. People were in shock. When you see these incidents on the screen, there are three options: one, that this is a nightmare and you’re dreaming, two, that that you are seeing a major IDF training exercise, or three – we messed up!”


In those chaotic early hours, there was much confusion. The scale of the attack, the number of infiltrations, the fate of the border communities—everything was fragmented, contradictory, or unknown. Instinctively, Guy called his wife, Anat, who held her own sensitive role in the army as head of HR for the special operations division. Leaving their four daughters at home with careful instructions to enter the bomb shelter during sirens, she drove straight to her unit.

At the time, Guy served as Head of the Influence Department, a unit created a decade earlier to counter hostile narratives by exposing the truth of how Israel’s enemies operate. His team’s work was part intelligence, part media, and part psychological warfare—documenting evidence from the battlefield and using it to reveal Hamas’s tactics to the world.

“For example,” Guy explained, “if you go inside a kindergarten in Gaza and inside, they have shells, or rifles, or hand grenades, or whatever, they will take pictures or videos of those things, and then we can use them online to show people this is how Hamas is using children as human shields.”

Collecting Horrific Data

Within this department existed a specialized reservist unit responsible for tactical influence operations: collecting physical and visual proof from combat zones—photographs, videos, seized equipment—that could be used to show the world what Israeli soldiers were witnessing firsthand.

Realizing the magnitude of what was unfolding, Guy immediately called the unit commander with a direct order: get to the south and gather everything. Every image, every recording, every discarded weapon or phone—anything that could help piece together the truth.

He had no idea at the time that this decision would turn his unit into the central data hub of the massacre.

Over the next four to five months, Guy’s team collected more than five terabytes of footage—raw, unfiltered, devastating material captured by terrorists’ GoPro cameras, their phones, and security systems in the attacked kibbutzim. His department organized the footage that was eventually shown to Prime Minister Netanyahu, President Biden, Secretary of Defense Austin, world leaders, diplomats, and major international media outlets.

And throughout this period, Guy personally watched every single video.

But the screens—horrific as they were—did not prepare him for the moment he decided to see the aftermath with his own eyes.

Hell On Earth

On October 9th, two days after the massacre, Guy, his assistant, and their driver drove to Kfar Aza and then to Kibbutz Be’eri. He had braced himself, he thought. He was a third-generation Holocaust survivor. He had stood inside Nazi death camps five times. He had spent his life studying the darkest corners of human cruelty.

“Nothing prepared me for what I saw.” Stepping into Kfar Aza, Guy felt the axis of his life tilt.

“It was…” He paused, searching for a word. “It wasn’t a death camp—that’s not quite right. It was hell on earth.”

Guy recalled, “On Monday morning, it was still burning. Houses were still burning. I remember walking in the streets of Kfar Aza and we have terrorists that are fighting against us in the row next to us. I remember walking inside houses and moving between one body and another. A body of a woman that lies on the washing machine, a body of a dog, a body of her husband, a body of a baby… Just bodies. I remember the road that goes there. I told my driver, ‘Listen, don't look to the side, just drive, straight, because you can see bodies after bodies after bodies.’ I was there a couple of hours, and then I went back.”

Back home that night, the dam broke. Guy burst into tears. “I'm not an emotional guy,” he says. “I'm not used to crying. I was at a point where I needed to break. I needed to release some of my feelings. And since then, I can't sleep at night. I have nightmares. For the first couple of months, I was constantly crying every night.”

The diagnosis came later— Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder —but Guy already knew something inside him had shattered.

His life would begin to change in ways he never anticipated.

Turning to God

Before the war, Guy had planned on retiring from the army, spending more time with his family, and working on civilian projects. In the six months after October 7th, Guy continued leading the Influence Department through the war’s most intense period. But when his successor finally took over, he stepped away from the army for the first time in more than 25 years. He expected a smooth transition into civilian life—a chance to rest, reset, and spend time with his family.

Instead, he walked straight into the emptiness left behind by trauma.

“For the first time in my life, I came back home without my encrypted military phone, without any responsibility, and in the first couple of weeks, I was broken. I couldn't pull myself together. I was in wars before, I was in Gaza, in Lebanon, in the Judea and Samaria area. I was shot at, and I shot at the enemy. I lost friends. This was something else.”

Then, one day, something small but life-altering happened.

Guy opened his closet and sitting on a shelf was a simple bag containing the tallit and tefillin he had received as a wedding gift from his father-in-law. He had barely touched them in years. Guy didn’t grow up religious; his wife, Anat, came from a more observant background, but their home life settled into a middle ground—kosher kitchen, Jewish holidays, but no Shabbat observance.

Guy hadn’t put on tefillin in years but something drew him to the bag.

He didn’t know exactly why but he picked up the phone and called his brother-in-law, a rabbi, to ask how to put them on.

Looking back, Guy speaks of that moment with emotion: “I think God saw me at my lowest and helped me get up.”

What began as a single act—a quiet, uncertain reaching—became the first step in a spiritual return. As Guy puts it, he felt an urgent need to rebuild meaning. “This world is a corridor to the next,” he said. “As long as I’m in this corridor, I want to become a better person. I want values that are connected to our roots. And I want to let go of the evil I saw.”

So, he began putting on tefillin every morning.

The connection Guy experienced as he began praying and reciting Psalms daily enabled him to rise above his brokenness and slowly return to everyday life. At first, he prayed alone, at home. “I needed a place to myself, with myself, because when you are praying, that's the only time that I have to think, to breathe, to be with yourself.”

Eventually, Guy ventured to the local synagogue. He’d been there before, on Jewish holidays and at Bar Mitzvah celebrations, but he’d never felt connected to the services.

“It was the first time that I came to a synagogue with the feeling of really wanting to be there, to open my eyes and ears, to understand what I'm doing there, to understand how to communicate with myself and how to start a conversation between me and God.”

Though he was afraid that he’d be criticized for doing things “wrong,” Guy discovered that the synagogue was a warm and welcoming place. “I found a beautiful community,” he said. “I felt at home.”

In addition to praying, Guy also began reading classic Jewish texts, from Ecclesiastes and the Talmud to The Paths of the Just. “I was looking for the truth, and I found it inside the ancient Jewish books. And one step at a time, I feel I’m in a very different position.”

Guy reflected, “This was the first time in my life as a grown-up that I did something for myself. Not for the military, not for the country, for myself. It helped me understand more about what I want to achieve, what I'm aiming for. It helped me become a better person, or aim to become a better person, and the only One that can say if I'm a better person or not is God.”

As Guy learned and connected to Judaism more, he decided to begin keeping Shabbat. This was, and remains, a struggle in many ways. On a practical level, it is challenging for his family and extended family, because he can no longer attend a Friday night dinner that is not within a walking distance. It is also challenging emotionally, because quiet times are difficult for Guy. “When you have PTSD, bad thoughts are looking for a place to get to you.”

He cherishes the extra time with his family. And when they’re not available, he leans on books, prayer, and reflection. Slowly, Shabbat is becoming not only a discipline, but a companion. “Shabbat is time for me to arrange my thoughts, to think more, to do less.”

Balancing Family and Spirituality

Spiritual growth does not happen in isolation—it ripples through a family. His wife, Anat, who is processing her own trauma from the war, has been very supportive of Guy’s journey.

“My wife is my best friend,” she said simply. And throughout this vulnerable new chapter, that friendship held fast. 

Still, Anat had concerns at first. She wondered how his newfound spirituality and observance would affect their home. “She asked me to take it one step at a time, and this is what I'm doing,” he says.

At first, Anat joined him in his explorations only to support him. But slowly, her own interest in Judaism began to grow. Their oldest daughter, now 18, also started expressing curiosity about her roots. Guy didn’t push, didn’t demand, didn’t expect—they each came to the journey in their own way, at their own rhythm.

Whatever direction his family takes, he will embrace it with love. He knows that, no matter what, they are there for each other.

Through it all, Guy continues to build a spiritual life that sustains him. Today he prays three times a day, speaking to God throughout the day.

“I feel that we are talking, always,” he says. “I know He’s listening. Even when I make mistakes.”

Living With the Trauma

Guy’s anxiety still surfaces in unexpected ways. He becomes tense when his daughters are out late, compulsively checking the clock until he hears the door. He avoids television entirely; even news clips or hostage stories can trigger overwhelming waves of emotion. Sleep still comes in fragments, broken by nightmares.

“There isn’t an hour when I stop thinking about what I saw,” he admitted. “There isn’t a week that I’m not crying.”

Alongside the grief sits a heavy, inexplicable guilt. He wasn’t part of the decision-making circle before October 7th, yet he feels personally responsible for what happened—an emotional burden many soldiers and intelligence officers share.

Through all of this, Guy returns again and again to the one place where the pain doesn’t swallow him: his connection with God.

“Besides my wife and my girls,” he said, “this process with God is maybe the best thing I have. It’s kept me alive, not physically, but mentally. It gave me meaning, gave answers to my questions. It’s the main thing that helps me keep my head above the water.”

Guy says that before the war, he carried “tons of ego” from his years in the military, from the sense of command and capability that defined his life. But the trauma stripped that away. “I thought the story was about me,” he reflects. “Now I understand the story is about me and Him, and about becoming a better person in this world.”

Current Projects

Even as he continues to heal, Guy refuses to let trauma freeze him in place. Ambition still burns in him—not for recognition, but for purpose. “We need to live,” he says. “I want to do good. I want to succeed. I want to help.”

Today, Guy is channeling his decades of intelligence and security experience into new initiatives in Israel and North America. His focus spans security consulting, influence strategy, community protection, and emerging technologies. Above all, he is driven by the desire to strengthen and safeguard Jewish communities worldwide.

He speaks with urgency: “Right now, the Jewish community around the world is in a very weak position. The next ten years are going to be very hard for Jews.”

He wants to use technology and intelligence methods—tools he mastered in the military—to fight antisemitism and reshape public perception. For him, this isn’t only strategy; it’s personal restitution, a way to transform pain into impact.

To succeed, he believes Jewish communities must think more cohesively. “We need all Jewish communities in every country to unite,” he explained, “to build a shared narrative, a clear message, a coordinated influence strategy. We have to be determined, persuasive, and accurate.”

His vision is practical but bold: a new infrastructure for Jewish resilience, informed by the lessons—especially the failures—of October 7th. Preparedness, he says, begins with humility: “the right team, in the right place, who don’t think they know everything.” With that, the IDF—and the Jewish world—can meet the challenges ahead. 

https://aish.com/an-israeli-intelligence-officers-search-for-god/

21 November 2025

English Subtitles: דברים קצרים, תולדות תשפ"ו | הגה"צ רבי אלימלך בידרמן שליט"א

 

Parasha Summary: Toldot - Yaakov, Esav & The Birthright


Comments appreciated, if we should post his Shiurim:

Parashat Toldot tells the story of Yitzhak and Rivka as they pray for children, leading to the birth of Esav and Yaakov, two brothers with opposite natures and destinies. We learn about the struggle within Rivka’s womb, the prophecy that the older will serve the younger, and the unfolding of their different paths as Esav becomes a man of the field while Yaakov dwells in tents. The parashah then reveals the tension surrounding the blessings of Yitzhak, the spiritual legacy he wishes to pass on, and how Rivka guides Yaakov to receive the blessing meant to continue the covenant of Avraham. Toldot teaches us about destiny, inner conflict, spiritual inheritance, and the delicate balance between family dynamics and divine purpose. ----------------------- About Eliyahu Pereira: Based in Tzfat, Eliyahu Pereira shares teachings rooted in Chassidut, Kabbalah, meditation, and breathwork—offering practical paths to inner alignment, dveikut, and connection to Hashem in daily life. His work speaks to the deep struggles and yearnings of this generation, helping seekers live with clarity, purpose, and presence. Through online classes, live courses, and private coaching for men, Eliyahu guides those looking to break through inner blocks, strengthen relationships, and reconnect with their truest essence. His unique approach integrates Torah wisdom with embodied practices that open the heart and quiet the noise. Eliyahu co-founded the Alshech Academy and leads Sha’ar HaYichud in Tzfat. He has also served as a translator for tzadikim such as Rav Shlomo Yehuda (The Yanuka) and Rav Itzhak Rafael Abuhatzeira. For those ready to live with deeper alignment and spiritual vitality, his teachings offer an open gate.

Remember Kristalnacht was First to attack Businesses and Synagogues

 

Mamdani Condemns Protest Language but Says Synagogue Shouldn’t Promote “Activities in Violation of International Law”


what law is he referring to?

Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani is distancing himself from the extreme rhetoric shouted at outside a Nefesh B’Nefesh event at Park East Synagogue on Wednesday night — while simultaneously accusing the synagogue of promoting actions he claims “violate international law”.

“The Mayor-elect has discouraged the language used at last night’s protest and will continue to do so,” Mamdani’s press secretary, Dora Pekec, said in a Thursday afternoon statement. “He believes every New Yorker should be free to enter a house of worship without intimidation, and that these sacred spaces should not be used to promote activities in violation of international law.”

When asked by the Jewish Insider to clarify what “activities” Pekec was referring to, Mamdani’s team said the remark was “specifically in reference to the organization’s promotion of settlement activity beyond the Green Line,” which they claimed “violates international law.”

Outside the event, anti-Israel demonstrators shouted explosive chants including “Death to the IDF,” “We don’t want no Zionists here,” “Resistance you make us proud, take another settler out,” and “From New York to Gaza, globalize the intifada.”

One protest leader repeatedly called for intimidation, shouting into a megaphone: “We need to make them scared. We need to make them scared. We need to make them scared.” The agitator added that it was activists’ “duty to make them think twice before holding these events.”

Governor Kathy Hochul condemned the incident, posting on X:

“No New Yorker should be intimidated or harassed at their house of worship. What happened last night at Park East Synagogue was shameful and a blatant attack on the Jewish community. Hate has no place in New York.”

The event hosted by Nefesh B’Nefesh proceeded despite the disruption.

(YWN World Headquarters – NYC)

https://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/israel-news/2475233/mamdani-condemns-protest-language-but-says-synagogue-shouldnt-promote-activities-in-violation-of-international-law.html


After protest at synagogue, Mamdani says Israel immigration event misused ‘sacred space’

NYC mayor-elect appears to suggest Nefesh B’nefesh’s promotion of immigration to Jewish state is a ‘violation of international law’ in statement that doesn’t address antisemitism

[timesofisrael]

Rosh Chodesh Kisleiv......One More Chance - The Great Revelation of Chasam Sofer

 

Toldos: 2000 Years of Beauty - The Moroccan Esrog (Part 1)

 

Eliezer Meir Saidel: Hand it Over – Toldot

 

Hand it Over – Toldot


 וַיֶּאֱהַב יִצְחָק אֶת עֵשָׂו כִּי צַיִד בְּפִיו וכו' (בראשית כה, כח).

 

One of the most perplexing things in sefer Breishit is Yitzchak's inexplicable love for Eisav.

 

We know that Yitzchak was physically blind. Some postulate that the reason Yitzchak did not know his son Eisav was a rasha was because he was blind.

 

At which point did Yitzchak lose his sight?

 

One Midrash (בראשית רבה, פרשה סה, אות י) states two possible reasons why Yitzchak went blind. The first is that after Avraham Avinu died, Eisav (aged 15) became a rasha. R' Elazar ben Azaria says in this Midrash (ibid.), that to save Yitzchak the embarrassment of going out in public and hearing from everyone how evil his son Eisav was, HKB"H made Yitzchak blind and he became housebound. Whether Yitzchak (75) went blind   exactly when Eisav (15) became a rasha, or … later, is not clear from this Midrash.

 

The second reason, according to this Midrash, is that Yitzchak became blind as a result of the Akeida - Yitzchak (37) either gazed directly at the Shechina, or the angels' tears fell in his eyes. Either way, this should have caused Yitzchak to die on the spot, but HKB"H had mercy on Avraham and He delayed Yitzchak's blindness until he was "old" (an unspecified age). This first Midrash does not give exact dates or ages when Yitzchak went blind.

 

A second Midrash (בראשית רבה, פרשה סה, אות ד) says that Yitzchak went blind from the incense that Eisav's Hittite wives were burning for avodah zara. Eisav married Yehudit and Bosmat when he was aged 40. At that point Yitzchak was 100-years old. Did Yitzchak become blind immediately when Eisav married these wives, or a number of years later? This second Midrash also does not specify an exact age.

 

The only definitive indication we have is from a third Midrash (תנחומא תולדות, אות ח) which says that in order for Yaakov to get Yitzchak's bracha instead of Eisav, Yitzchak had to lose his sight. How old was Yitzchak when he gave the bracha of Eisav to Yaakov? 123-years-old. According to this opinion, for the last 57 years of his life Yitzchak was certainly blind.

 

From all this, it is very clear that by the time Yitzchak lost his sight, Eisav was already 63-years-old. In all this time, it is impossible to attribute Yitzchak's "love" for Eisav to his physical blindness.


According to other perushim, Eisav "deceived" Yitzchak כִּי צַיִד בְּפִיו. Eisav would pretend to be a big talmid chacham and a tzaddik in front of his father, but otherwise he behaved like a total rasha.


Was Yitzchak (who could still see) deceived by Eisav's playacting?

 

Eisav and his Hittite wives were living in Yitzchak's house and Yitzchak could smell the incense they were offering to avodah zara – it was inescapable.

 

By the time Yitzchak gave Yaakov Eisav's bracha (when Yitzchak was 123-years-old) it is clear that he knew that Eisav was not a tzaddik. Otherwise, why would he give Eisav explicit instructions how to hunt and prepare the meat for him - וְעַתָּה שָׂא נָא כֵלֶיךָ תֶּלְיְךָ וְקַשְׁתֶּךָ וְצֵא הַשָּׂדֶה וְצוּדָה לִּי צָיִדה (בראשית כז, ג). The Baal HaTurim says the word צָיִדה is written in the Torah with an extraneous letter ה, referring to the five halachot of shechita and the five simanim of purity in birds. Yitzchak was saying to Eisav "Make sure to do the shechita properly and don't bring me treif meat!" If Yitzchak thought that Eisav was such a "groisse tzaddik", who was "machmir" in taking trumot and maasot from salt and hay, then there would have been no need for spelling out to him the halachot of shechita.

 

When Yaakov entered the tent and uttered HKB"H's name, Yitzchak was confused הַקֹּל קוֹל יַעֲקֹב וְהַיָּדַיִם יְדֵי עֵשָׂו (שם, כב). Yitzchak was stunned to hear from who he thought was Eisav – the name of HKB"H … because Eisav never uttered HKB"H's name!

 

It is clear from the pshat of the psukkim (not from some convoluted "drush" or hints) that Yitzchak knew exactly who Eisav was and despite this … Yitzchak loved Eisav. What does it mean he "loved" Eisav, how can it be that Yitzchak would love someone he knew was a rasha? True, he didn't hear it from neighbors' gossip (HKB"H spared him that), but he saw it with his own two eyes (before he went blind) in his own house.

 

Let us revisit that passuk again and we will notice a very interesting thing.

 

The passuk above says וַיֶּאֱהַב יִצְחָק אֶת עֵשָׂו כִּי צַיִד בְּפִיו וְרִבְקָה אֹהֶבֶת אֶת יַעֲקֹב. There is something out of place here, can you notice what it is?

 

The second part of the passuk says וְרִבְקָה אֹהֶבֶת אֶת יַעֲקֹב, Rivka loves (in the present tense) Yaakov. If this is the Hebrew grammatical structure – loving in the present tense, then, for symmetry, the first part of the passuk should read וְיִצְחָק אוֹהֵב אֶת עֵשָׂו כִּי צַיִד בְּפִיו - Yitzchak loves (present tense) Eisav … and Rivka loves (present tense) Yaakov. But that is not what it says.

 

The passuk says וַיֶּאֱהַב יִצְחָק אֶת עֵשָׂו, that Yitzchak loved (past tense) Eisav. When you have a patach under the letter "vav", this changes the word from present tense to past tense (conversely, if there was a she'va under the vav, it would change it to future tense). So וַיֶּאֱהַב means Yitzchak loved (past tense) Eisav. But that is a very convoluted way to write "loved" (past tense). If you want to say that Yitzchak loved Eisav, it would have been much simpler to say וְיִצְחָק אָהַב אֶת עֵשָׂו – just like וְרִבְקָה אֹהֶבֶת אֶת יַעֲקֹב. That would be syntactically symmetrical (although we still need to explain the difference of tenses between Yitzchak and Rivka).

 

The word וַיֶּאֱהַב is a very strange word. It is a kind of a "schizophrenic" word. The addition of the letter "yud" seems to indicate future tense, but the patach under the "vav" seems to indicate past tense. It is almost as if the word is struggling within itself. It is a mixture of love in the past and love in the future, but it is not totally clear which. The only thing that is clear from it is that it is not love in the present.

 

Let us re-read this passuk using the above. "Yitzchak loved (will-love?) Eisav … and Rivka loves Yaakov".

 

When you read it in that way you get a profound insight into the entire parsha and begin to comprehend the greatness of Yitzchak.

 

Yitzchak did not love Eisav (in the present tense). In fact, Yitzchak had ZERO naches from Eisav from age 13 onwards. Until age bar mitzvah, the twin brothers Eisav and Yaakov were practically indistinguishable in character. They were both bochrim, learning Torah in yeshiva, they both had long payot, they both wore tzitzit, they both sang zmirot at the Shabbat table (in harmony). Aside from the outward physical appearance (hair disproportionality), they both seemed like good Yiddishe ingelach!

 

At age 13, however, their distinct personalities began to emerge (Rashi). Then we have our passuk above. From this point on, Yitzchak did not love Eisav in the present tense. He loved him in the past tense (how Eisav was before bar mitzvah) and also, he will love him in the future tense. What does that mean – in the future tense?

 

The Gemara (Avodah Zara 11a) says that when the passuk says שְׁנֵי גיֹיִם [קרי: גוֹיִם] בְּבִטְנֵךְ it is referring to Rebi (Yehuda HaNasi) and Antoninus.

 

We all know who Rebi was – he was descended from the lineage of David HaMelech and was the author of the Mishna. But who was Antoninus?

 

Antoninus was a Roman Emperor. There is a discrepancy amongst historians exactly which emperor (Marcus Aurelius, Septimius Severus, etc.), but that detail is irrelevant for our purposes. The "legend" of Rebi and Antoninus involves a kind of "dialogue" between leaders of the sons of Yaakov and the sons of Eisav (Edom).

 

We formerly have similar dialogues taking place - in the Greek era between Alexander the Great and שִׁמְעוֹן הַצַּדִּיק כֹּהֵן גָּדוֹל and later, in the Roman era, between R' Akiva and Tinnius Rufus. What makes Rebi and Antoninus special though, is that this dialogue was one of friendship, not animosity.

 

This friendship began from birth (מנורת המאור, סימן פג). When Rebi was born, the Roman emperor at the time, Hadrian, decreed that it was forbidden to perform brit milah. Rebi's father, Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel defied the decree and circumcised his son Yehuda. A Roman governor discovered this and sent a report back to Rome. Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel, his wife and the baby Yehuda were summoned to Rome to stand trial.

 

On the way, they stopped off at an inn, where they met a royal Roman couple, who had also just given birth to a son, Antoninus. This common thread sparked a discussion between the couples and when the mother of Antoninus heard that baby Rebi and his family were summoned to Rome to be executed, she was shocked and offered a solution. She suggested that she and Rebi's mother temporarily switch babies. Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel and his wife would take Antoninus to Rome instead of Rebi and the emperor Hadrian would see that he was uncircumcised and release them.

 

This is in fact what happened. When Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel showed Hadrian the uncircumcised baby, the emperor in a fury executed the Roman governor who had informed on them. Meanwhile baby Antoninus was temporarily breast fed by Rebi's mother (Tosfot, Avodah Zara 10b) and Rebi received Antoninus' mother's milk.

 

Throughout their lives Rebi and Antoninus were like brothers, although Antoninus considered himself Rebi's servant. There was a tunnel connecting their houses and they shared sumptuous feasts (Breishit Rabba 11,4). Antoninus always consulted with Rebi before embarking on a battle and as a result always triumphed. He rewarded Rebi with wealth and lavish gifts, which enabled Rebi to devote his entire time to formulating the Mishna, without the yoke of parnasa. The two engaged in deep spiritual discussion on various Torah topics.

 

As a result of receiving the pure milk of Rebi's mother, Antoninus eventually converted to Judaism (ירושלמי מגילה א, יא). On the other hand, by receiving Antoninus' mother's impure milk, Rebi later suffered thirteen years with pains in his teeth (Bava Metzia 85a).

 

The Megaleh Amukot (ואתחנן, אופן פג) says that Rebi was a gigul of Yaakov Avinu and Antoninus was gilgul of Eisav. Although Eisav was a rasha most of his life, for the first 13 years he was a tzaddik, by virtue of the pure milk he received from Rivka Imeinu.

 

This is what it means וַיֶּאֱהַב יִצְחָק אֶת עֵשָׂו. Yitzchak loved who Eisav was in the beginning, before he became a rasha. Yitchak will (in the future) love the descendant of Eisav – Antoninus.

 

Rebi and Antoninus embodied what Yitzchak envisioned for his two sons. That Yaakov would be the talmid chacham and Eisav would be the provider, in a Yissachar-Zevulun relationship. If Eisav had not become a rasha, that is what might have been. Instead, Eisav, through his evil choices, gave rise to both the darker side of Edom – Amalek, as well as the pinnacle of Edom – Antoninus.

 

Yitzchak Avinu was not blind to Eisav, not physically and not spiritually. Yitzchak Avinu could see down the path of history to two future eras where his vision for the two brothers would be realized.

 

The first was with Rebi and Antoninus after the destruction of Bayit Sheini when Am Yisrael descended into galut Edom. The second will be when the HKB"H sends the Mashiach. The gematria of וַיֶּאֱהַב יִצְחָק אֶת עֵשָׂו כִּי צַיִד בְּפִיו is also the gematria of וּמְצָאוּךָ כֹּל הַדְּבָרִים הָאֵלֶּה בְּאַחֲרִית הַיָּמִים (דברים ד, ל). The gematria of וַיֶּאֱהַב יִצְחָק אֶת עֵשָׂו is also יִרְגְּזוּ כֹּל יֹשְׁבֵי הָאָרֶץ כִּי בָא יוֹם ה' (יואל ב, א) and לְעֵת עֶרֶב יִהְיֶה אוֹר (זכריה יד, ז) - the prophecies of the Geulah.

 

Rashi, quoting Tehilim (פ, יד) says that Eisav is likened to a חֲזִיר. R' Bachyei (Vayikra 11, 14) says that the reason for this is because Edom destroyed Bayit Sheini and it will the task of Edom לְהַחֲזִיר הָעֲטָרָה לְיָשְׁנָהּ. Since they destroyed the 2nd Beit HaMikdash, Edom will be instrumental in rebuilding the 3rd Beit HaMikdash.

 

After almost 2000 years during which they held the reigns of malchut by virtue of the milk that Eisav received from Rivka and the tears Eisav wept when Yaakov stole his bracha, Edom will eventually מַחֲזִיר the malchut, they will "hand it over", back to HKB"H.

 

Some people think that we are seeing this process unfolding before our very eyes, with the modern day Rebi and Antoninus. Although the resemblance between Bibi/Rebi and Trump/Antoninus requires some stretch of the imagination, there are also unmistakable similarities. The political leaders of Am Yisrael and Edom, the close friendship between the two, the conversion of Trump's daughter to Judaism, etc.

 

It might simply be wishful thinking, but on the other hand it might not. The only thing separating it from reality is not the US, but us - Am Yisrael! If we can get it together and be worthy of it, it will not be fantasy, but reality. After millenia of missed opportunities, we have a golden chance to make things right by concentrating on the עִקַּר and not the טָפֵל. If, instead of continuing to quibble amongst ourselves we can for once rise above the occasion, with a common cause, perhaps we will b"H merit seeing Yitzchak's vision in our time.

 

It has already begun with the younger generation. The youngsters are waking up. A wave of reconciliation and קֵרוּב is washing over the younger generation of our nation. We need to foster it and at the very least - not hamper its natural course. Jews all over galut are receiving reminders in ever increasing intensity - where our true home is. We need to heed the call and begin making plans.

 

הַקֹּל קוֹל יַעֲקֹב וְהַיָּדַיִם יְדֵי עֵשָׂו – We need to do our part, with our voice, not our hands. It is Am Yisrael's job to concentrate on the voice, not the hands. We will not merit the Geulah because of the labor of our hands, but because of the unity of our voice. The job of the hands is that of Eisav, of Edom. If we are of one voice, then and only then - the hands of Eisav/Edom will be the hands that hand over the malchut to HKB"H who will reign forever.

 

 

Shabbat Shalom

Eliezer Meir Saidel

Machon Lechem Hapanim

www.machonlechemhapanim.org

Satmar Rebbe Draws Massive Crowd in Meron as Two-Week Israel Visit Continues

  MERON, ISRAEL — Thousands gathered on Motzei Shabbos in Meron as Rabbi Aharon Teitelbaum, the Satmar Rebbe of Kiryas Joel, led a major ...